N RE:      : F & S 3000, Inc.    : 
 d/b/a 3rd  Street Mart    : DOCKET NO. D-2007-2006-00075                           
 612 West 3rd  Street    : DIA NO. 07DOCBL038
 Davenport, Iowa   52802   :                 
                                     :  FINAL DECISION 
 Liquor License No.   LE0001172  : 
 ___________________________________________________________________________
       NOW,  on this 27th day of November, 2007, this matter comes before  the Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division (ABD) on the timely request for  review filed in this docket by F & S 3000, Inc. (Licensee). 
       The  record in this docket discloses that on May 3, 2007, the City of Davenport  (City) filed an administrative hearing complaint against the Licensee.   The complaint alleged:
       1. On  or about September 5, 2005, and again in September 2006, the Licensee,  or by an agent, manager or owner of the Licensee, did violate Iowa Code  § 123.39(1)(b)(1) and Davenport Municipal Ordinance § 5.10.230(A),  by misrepresenting a material fact on the application and renewal application  for liquor control license LE0001172; and,
       2. On  or about April 13, 2007, the Licensee, or by an agent, manager or owner,  did violate §§ 123.3(26)(d) and 123.39(1)(b)(4), through the happening  of an event (felony conviction) that results in disqualification from  holding a liquor license.
       A  Notice of Hearing scheduled the matter for May 30, 2007.  On that  date, an administrative hearing was held before an administrative law  judge in accordance with Iowa Code chapters 17A and 123.  Assistant  City Attorney Brian Heyer represented the City.  The Licensee was  represented by Attorney David Treimer.
   On June 21, 2007,  the administrative law judge issued a Proposed Decision revoking the  Licensee’s license.  The Licensee timely appealed the action  of the ABD and was permitted to remain open for business pending final  agency action.   
       The  Licensee and the City were given the opportunity to file exceptions  and present briefs in support of their respective positions.  The  objections and exceptions of the Licensee were due no later than the  close of business on August 15, 2007.  Responsive briefs and exceptions  were due by the close of business on September 14, 2007.  The Licensee  requested and was granted until September 7, 2007, to file a brief.   The deadline for responsive briefs was extended to October 8, 2007.   Both parties timely filed briefs. 
       Upon  the motion of a party to the administrative hearing or upon the motion  of the Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division Administrator, the Administrator  may review the proposed decision and may reverse or modify any finding  of fact if a preponderance of the evidence will support the determination  to reverse or modify the finding.  Iowa Code § 17A.15(3).   The Administrator may also reverse any conclusion of law that the Administrator  finds to be in error.  Id
       In  the instant case, the Administrator has reviewed the entire record and  believes the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Decision  and Order should be affirmed.
       The  Iowa Legislature enacted Iowa Code Chapter 123 to protect the welfare,  health, peace, morals and safety of Iowans.  Iowa Code § 123.1.   All provisions of Chapter 123 are to be construed liberally for the  accomplishment of that purpose.  Id.  Iowa law prohibits a  person or entity from manufacturing for sale, selling, offering or keeping  for sale, possessing or transporting alcoholic beverages except under  the terms provided in Chapter 123.  Iowa Code § 123.2.
       Iowa  Code chapter 123 mandates certain requirements be met before a liquor  license may be issued by the Division.  Specifically, the chapter  requires an applicant to be a person of “good moral character.”   “Good moral character” is a defined term meaning any person with  financial standing and good reputation sufficient to satisfy the Administrator  that the person will:             1) comply with chapter 123 as well as the laws, rules and ordinances  governing the license;  2)  has not had a liquor license,  wine permit or beer permit revoked within the past two years; 3) is  a citizen of the United States and a resident of Iowa or licensed to  do business in the state in the case of a corporation; and, 4) has not  been convicted of a felony offense within the past five years.   Iowa Code § 123.3(26).
       The  “good moral character” standards apply to:  1) each of the  officers, directors and partners of a licensed entity; 2) all persons  who directly or indirectly own or control ten percent or more of any  class of stock; and, 3) all persons who directly or indirectly have  an interest of ten percent or more in the ownership of the licensed  entity.  Id.  Licensees are responsible for remaining compliant  with all requirements during the entire period of the license.   Id. 
       Iowa  Code chapter 123 sets forth the content of liquor license applications.   As part of the application process, the applicant must, in part, fully  disclose:  1) all persons, in the case of a corporation, the officers,  directors and persons owning or controlling ten percent or more of the  capital stock of the corporation having a financial interest, by way  of loan, ownership or otherwise, in the business; 2) a statement of  whether any of the officers, directors and persons named on the application  have ever been convicted of any offense against the laws of the United  States, or any state or territory of the United States, or any political  subdivision of any state or territory.  Iowa Code § 123.31.   A licensee may complete a simplified application for renewal of the  license when qualifications and qualification information have not changed  since the original application was filed with the Division.  Iowa  Code § 123.35. 
       The  Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division or the City may suspend a license  for a period not to exceed one year, revoke the license, or impose a  civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars per violation,   Iowa Code § 123.39(1)(a).  Grounds for the imposition of a civil  penalty or the suspension or revocation of a liquor license include,  but are not limited to:                             1) misrepresentation of any material fact in the license application;  2) change of ownership or interest in the business not reported to and  approved by the local authority and the Division; and, 3) an event which  would have resulted in the disqualification from the original issuance  of the license.  Iowa Code § 123.39(1)(b).
       The  issue in the instant case is twofold:  1) whether the Licensee  misrepresented ownership on its license renewal applications in 2005,  and 2006, when Ghulam Chaudhry was listed as the new 50% owner in place  of the prior 50% owner Ali Murtaza, because Ghulam Chaudhry and Ali  Murtaza are the same person using different names and social security  numbers; and 2) whether the ownership of the Licensee includes an individual  who is ineligible to hold a liquor license because of a felony conviction.
       On  August 27, 2003, liquor license number LE0001172 was issued to the Licensee  based on the information provided in the license application listing  Ali Murtaza and Shahid Mahmood as equal owners of the Licensee.   The application reflected the birth date of Ali Murtaza as May 15, 1965,  and his social security number as 062-88-0965.  Ali Murtaza signed  the application on behalf of the Licensee.  City’s Exhibit 1  and Proposed Decision, page 2. 
       The  2003, application for the liquor license states that the Licensee controls  the proposed licensed premises by ownership.  City’s Exhibit  1.  The information is supported by an attached warranty deed for  the property reflecting Ali Murtaza and Ghulam M. Chaudhry as owners  of the property described as the East 24 feet of the West 52 feet in  Block 17 in the Original Town (now City) of Davenport, Scott, Iowa as  tenants in common.  An attached commercial lease for the property  shows Ali Murtaza and Ghulam Chaudhry as tenants in common leased the  property to the Licensee.  City’s Exhibit 1 and Proposed Decision,  page 3.
       On  September 10, 2004, liquor license number LE0001172 was renewed based  on information provided in the application signed by Ali Murtaza.   The 2004, application reflects no change of ownership within the corporate  structure since the license was first issued in 2003. City’s Exhibit  2 and Proposed Decision, page 3.  
       A  special meeting of the Licensee was purportedly held on May 26, 2005,  at which time the following resolutions were adopted:  1) Ghulam  Chaudhry was named president and Shahid Mahmood was named treasurer  of the Licensee; 2) one hundred shares of stock (50 shares each for  Ghulam Chaudhry and Shahid Mahmood) were to be issued with no stock  certificates; 3) Ali Murtaza was to be retained as manager and chief  operating officer; and 4) Ali “Jim” Murtaza was authorized to be  a signatory on negotiable instruments, to enter into contracts on behalf  of the Licensee and to bind the Licensee in any such contract.   City Exhibit 7 and Proposed Decision, pages 3 and 4.1 
       On  June 20, 2005, the Licensee filed a statement of change of registered  officer/agent with the Iowa Secretary of State’s Office.  The  registered agent was changed from Ali Murtaza at 1139 Brady Street in  Davenport, Iowa to Ghulam Chaudhry at 612 W 3rd Street in  Davenport, Iowa.  The statement was signed by Ghulam Chaudhry as  President.   City’s Exhibits 3 and 6 and Proposed Decision, page  4.
       According  to Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry, he paid for his 50 shares by conveying his  interest in the real property that had been jointly owned by Ali Murtaza  and Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry.  Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry further testified  that he gave Ali Murtaza his power of attorney because Chaudhry lives  in New Jersey.  However, there is question that the document is  valid since it does not appear to have been recorded with the Scott  County Recorder’s Office.  Proposed Decision, page 5 and City’s  Exhibit 29.  
       The  following transfers by warranty deed documents are recorded with the  Scott County Recorder’s Office: 
 a. Conveyance  of the interest in the real property in the East 24 feet of the West  52 feet of Lot 3 in Block 17 from Ali Murtaza and Aileen Murtaza, husband  and wife, to Ali Murtaza and Shahid Mahmood, as tenants in common, dated  May 3, 2005.  Proposed Decision, page 5 and City‘s Exhibit 17  and Proposed Decision, page 5.
 b. Conveyance  of the interest in the real property in the East 24 feet of the West  52 feet of Lot 3 in Block 17 from Ghulam M. Chaudhry, a single person,  to Ali Murtaza and Shahid Mahmood, as tenants in common, dated August  19, 2005.  The document is signed by Ali Murtaza on behalf of Ghulam  M. Chaudhry, as power of attorney.  Proposed City‘s Exhibit 16  and Proposed Decision, page 5.
c. Conveyance  of the interest in the real property in the East 24 feet of the West  52 feet of Lot 3 in Block 17 from Ali Murtaza and Aileen Murtaza, husband  and wife, and Ghulam Chaudhry2 to the Licensee, date August  24, 2005.  City’s Exhibit 14 and Proposed Decision, page 5.
      On  September 5, 2005, Shahid Mahmood signed and submitted a renewal application  for liquor license LE0001172 to the City.  Shahid Mahmood and Ghulam  Chaudhry are reflected as the shareholders of the Licensee with each  holding 50% of the shares.  The information was documented by the  attachment of minutes from a May 26, 2005, corporate meeting.   City’s Exhibit 7 and Proposed Decision, page 6.
       Upon  review of the application, the City determined Ali Murtaza needed to  be added to the ownership section.  The application was returned  to Shahid Mahmood and Ali Murtaza who complied with the City’s request  by adding Ali Murtaza with 0% in the ownership section and the word  “none” in the criminal history section of the application.   The City then approved renewal of the license.  City’s Exhibit  7 and Proposed Decision, page 6.
       In  September 2006, the Licensee applied for renewal of the liquor license  by submitting an electronic application with the same ownership information  that had been submitted in September 2005.  City’s Exhibit 8  and Proposed Decision, page 6.
       On  the day before the contested case hearing, the Licensee’s registered  agent was changed from Ghulam Chaudhry to Shahid Mahmood.  The  change occurred during a special meeting of the Licensee held on May  29, 2007.  Also, during the meeting, a resolution was passed dismissing  Ali “Jim” Murtaza as the financial manager of the Licensee.   The changes are recorded in the minutes of the meeting of the Licensee.   Licensee’s Exhibit L-3 and Proposed Decision, pages 7 and 8.  
         At the hearing, both Ghulam Chaudhry and Shahid Mahmood testified that  during the May 29, 2007, meeting the decision was made to give Ghulam  Mustapha Chaudhry 67% of the corporate shares because Shahid Mahmood  had made a loan to Ali Murtaza without Chaudhry’s knowledge.   No explanation was given as to why the transaction is not reflected  in the minutes of the meeting.  Instead, the Licensee submitted  corporate minutes dated May 26, 2005 – not May 26, 2007.  Proposed  Decision, page 8.
       The  May 26, 2005, corporate minutes submitted at the hearing appear to be  identical to the minutes of the May 26, 2005, corporate meeting submitted  with the 2005, renewal application with several important distinctions.   Specifically:
 a. The first version  of the May 26, 2005, minutes give Ghulam Chaudhry 50 shares and Shahid  Mahmood 50 shares; however, the second version gives Ghulam Chaudhry  67 shares and Shahid Mahmood 33 shares.
b. The second  version bears a “FAXED” stamp that has not been crossed out and  a notary stamp for a notary whose commission expired six months before  the May 29, 2007, date.  Moreover, the notary does not state the  date on which the signatures were witnessed and notarized.  Alternatively,  the first version of the minutes have neither the “FAXED” stamp  nor the notary stamp.
c.  Only the second  version states a deed will be accepted from Ali and Aileen Murtaza for  the property located at 648 Marquette Street, in Davenport, Scott County,  Iowa.  However, the warranty deed for the property was recorded  in Scott County nearly two years earlier.3  City Exhibit  15 and Proposed Decision, page 9.
      At  the hearing, Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry testified that he is the brother  of Ghulam Murtaza Chaudhry, a/k/a. Ali Murtaza.  Ghulam Mustafa  Chaudhry further testified that in Pakistan, a person’s last name  is the family name and siblings often share the same first name, but  the middle name is distinctive.  He estimated that there could  be as many as 20 persons named Ghulam Chaudhry in his hometown in Pakistan.   Proposed Decision, Page 4.
       The  record reflects that Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry has been in the United  States since 1985 and is a U. S. citizen.  At the hearing, Ghulam  Mustafa Chaudhry submitted copies of his social security card, social  security number 147-85-1471, and his New Jersey commercial driver’s  license.  Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry’s appearance at the hearing  matched the photo on his driver’s license.  For the most part,  Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry has lived in New Jersey since 2000.  Licensee’s  Exhibit L-1 and Proposed Decision, page 4. 
       According  to the documents in a federal criminal case against Ali Murtaza and  the testimony of Aileen Murtaza, Al Murtaza was born in Pakistan on  May 15, 1965.  His birth name was Ghulam Murtaza Chaudhry and he  came to the United States in 1987.  At the hearing, Aileen Murtaza  submitted documents that she had obtained from Pakistan indicating Ghulam  Murtaza Chaudhry had legally changed his name to Ali Murtaza in 1995.   Licensee’s Exhibit L-2.
       The  record in the case reflects that Murtaza’s initial contact with U.  S. Immigration officials occurred in Patterson, New Jersey in November  1987, when he applied for Temporary Resident Status, Special Agricultural  Worker.  At that time, Murtaza stated he entered the United States  without a visa, not through a port-of-entry on March 21, 1985.   Murtaza further stated that he was born on April 15, 1964, in Pakistan.   City’s Exhibit 19.  The federal government later discovered fraud  on the application.  Id.
       In  February 1988, Murtaza applied for and obtained social security number  157-82-8013 using the name Ghulam Murtaza Chaudhry and the date of birth  of April 4, 1964.  In July 1998, using the name Ali Murtaza and  the date of birth of May 15, 1965, Murtaza applied for and obtained  social security number 062-88-0965.  At that time, Murtaza told  federal authorities that he had never before applied for a social security  number.  City’s Exhibit 19.  The discrepancies prompted  an investigation by federal and state authorities.    
       The  fingerprint cards used by Ali Murtaza to obtain the social security  numbers were later compared by a fingerprint technician from the Iowa  Division of Criminal Investigation, who determined the fingerprints  belonged to the same person.  Murtaza was arrested and later entered  pleas of guilty to seven felony counts in the United States District  Court for the Southern District.  Two counts were for providing  False Statements in an Immigration Document and five counts were for  Misuse of a Social Security Number.  Murtaza was sentenced to six  months in prison on each felony count, all counts to be served concurrently.   City’s Exhibits 19 through 22 and Proposed Decision, page 7.    
       On  the date of the hearing, Ali Murtaza was incarcerated, in part for illegally  obtaining the social security number he used to obtain liquor license  number LE0001172 in 2003.  Ali Murtaza’s wife, Aileen Murtaza,  continued to work at the 3rd Street Mart as a cashier and  assumed the responsibilities of Ali Murtaza by ordering inventory and  making bank deposits.  Shahid Mahmood, a first cousin of Ghulam  Mustafa Chaudhry and Ali Murtaza, occasionally works as a cashier, but  also operates another business in Dubuque.  Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry  lives in New Jersey, but comes to Davenport every 6-12 weeks.   Proposed Decision, page 7.
 Issue I.   Misrepresentation of Ownership.
       The  administrative law judge found the preponderance of the evidence presented  at the hearing established that Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry, a/k/a Ghulam  M. Chaudhry and Ghulam Chaudhry is the brother of Ali Murtaza, a/k/a  Jim Murtaza and Ghulam Murtaza Chaudhry.  The Administrator agrees.   Based on the record, it cannot be concluded that the Licensee misrepresented  ownership information on the 2005, and 2006, applications.4  
 Issue II.   Licensee Ineligibility – Felony Counts.
       There  is no question that, as a convicted felon, Ali Murtaza is ineligible  to hold a liquor license because he no longer meets the standards of  “good moral character” as required by Iowa Code § 123.3(26).   The record in the instant case clearly demonstrates that on the date  of his felony convictions, Ali Murtaza was a director of the Licensee.   The standards of “good moral character” apply to the officers, directors,  partners and all persons who directly or indirectly own or control 10%  or more of the Licensee.  Hence, the Licensee became ineligible  to hold liquor license number LE0001172 on the date of Ali Murtaza’s  federal felony convictions.
       The  May 29, 2007, corporate minutes submitted as Licensee’s Exhibit L-3,  reflect the Licensee’s Board of Directors took action to dismiss Ali  “Jim” Murtaza as the financial manager of the Licensee.  Yet,  no action was taken to address or change Murtaza’s status as a director.   Even if such action had been taken, it would have been after Murtaza’s  felony convictions and would not have retroactively preserved the Licensee’s  right to hold the license.  
       The  Licensee’s submission of a second set of corporate minutes presented  as part of Licensee’s Exhibit L-3, raised serious credibility questions  about the reliability of the corporate documents.  At the hearing  both Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry and Shahid Mahmood testified that the business  reflected in the minutes occurred during a meeting of the Licensee held  the day before the administrative hearing on May 29, 2007.   
       The  administrative law judge opined that minutes had no credibility due  to the number of inconsistencies and irregularities discussed in items  a. through c. on page 8.  Moreover, the administrative law judge  opined that the testimony of Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry and Shahid Mahmood  regarding Licensee’s Exhibit L-3 was not credible.  “If their  testimony that these Corporate Minutes reflected action they took on  May 29, 2007, was to be believed, then on May 29, 2007, they specifically  retained Ali Murtaza as “Manager” and “Chief Operating Officer”  and authorized him to sign all negotiable instruments and contracts  binding the corporation.”  Proposed Decision, page 12. 
       In  the Licensee’s brief, the Licensee argues the administrative law judge  exceeded her authority when she ruled on an issue not raised on the  complaint nor litigated at the hearing.  Moreover, the Licensee  argues that the administrative law judge exceeded her authority when  she revoked the Licensee’s license based on ineligibility of a director  without providing due process rights to the licensee to cure the deficiency.   Licensee’s Brief, page 5.  The Administrator finds the Licensee’s  arguments to be without merit.
       The  hearing complaint filed against the Licensee clearly contains two separate  allegations:  1)  whether the Licensee misrepresented ownership  on its license renewal applications in 2005, and 2006, when Ghulam Chaudhry  was listed as the new 50% owner in place of the prior 50% owner Ali  Murtaza, because Ghulam Chaudhry and Ali Murtaza are the same person  using different names and social security numbers; and 2) whether the  ownership of the Licensee includes an individual who is not eligible  to hold a liquor license because of a felony conviction.
       The  Licensee received notice of both allegations in the administrative hearing  complaint attached to the notice of hearing that was served on Demarcus  Couch, an employee of the Licensee, by the Scott County Sheriff on May  15, 2007.  Proof of Service, Scott County Sheriff’s Office, dated  May 15, 2007.  Specifically, the second allegation states, “and  on or about April 13, 2007, the Licensee did, or by an agent, manager  or owner, did violate Iowa Code §§ 123.39(4) and 123.26(d) through  the happening of an event (felony conviction) that results in disqualification  from holding a liquor license.”  Iowa Code § 123.3(26)(d) prohibits  felons from holding a liquor license, wine permit or beer permit in  the State.  
       The  Licensee accurately points out that Ali Murtaza was not a felon and  was eligible to sit as a director of the Licensee when the Licensee’s  application for renewal of the license was filed in 2006.  While  it is true that the City was unable to prove misrepresentation on the  2006, application for renewal of the license, it is also true that Ali  Murtaza became ineligible to hold any liquor license, wine permit or  beer permit in the State on April 13, 2007, when he entered pleas of  guilty to the seven federal felony charges.  Moreover, because  Ali Murtaza was a director of the Licensee on April 13, 2007, the Licensee  also became ineligible to hold the license.
       The  Administrator hereby ADOPTS  the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Decision and Order  proposed by the administrative law judge in this docket.
       IT  IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of  Law and the Decision and Order in this docket are hereby AFFIRMED  in their entirety.  The application for renewal of liquor license  number LE0001172, issued to F & S 3000, Inc., d/b/a 3rd  Street Mart in Davenport, Iowa is hereby REVOKED.
 
       The  parties are notified that this Order constitutes final agency action  for the purpose of Iowa Code chapters 17A and 123.  The Order becomes  final unless a party to the hearing files a petition for judicial review  with the Iowa District Court within thirty days from the date of the  final decision.  Iowa Code § 17A.19.
       DATED  this 27th day of November, 2007, in Ankeny, Iowa.
                                                                           IOWA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION
           ______________________________________
                                                                           LYNN M. WALDING
                                                                           Administrator
 Copies to:
 Margaret LaMarche
 Administrative Law Judge
 Division of Appeals and Fair Hearings
 Lucas State Office Building
 Des Moines, Iowa  50319
 John Lundquist
 Assistant Attorney General
 Department of Justice
 Hoover State Office Building
 Des Moines, Iowa  50319
 Lt. Frank Fisher 
 ISP, District #12
 22365 20th Avenue
 Stockton, Iowa  52769-9612
 Craig Malin
 City Administrator / Clerk
 226 W 4th Street
 Davenport, Iowa  52801-1398
 Chief Michael Bladel
 Davenport Police Department
 420 Harrison Street
 Davenport, Iowa  52801
 John Henry Ellison
 Iowa Lottery
 2323 Grand Avenue                                 
 Des Moines, Iowa  50309
 Beverly Zyltra
 Department of Inspections & Appeals
 Lucas State Office Building
 Des Moines, Iowa  50319
 Gayle Collins
 Commissioner
 Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division
 1918 SE Hulsizer Road
 Ankeny, Iowa  50021
 Karen Freund
 Licensing Manager
 Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division
 1918 SE Hulsizer Road
 Ankeny, Iowa  50021
 Brian Heyer
 Assistant City Attorney
 226 West Fourth Street
 Davenport, Iowa  52801-1398
 David Treimer
 Attorney at Law
 601 Brady Street, Suite 211
 Davenport, Iowa  52803